17.7.10

MATIA GUBEC (RESEARCH ON ST. MARK SQUARE GORNJI GRAD'S UNDERGOUND TUNNEL SYSTEM)

"Matija" Gubec (Hungarian: Gubecz Máté) (before 1556 – 15 February 1573) was a Croatian peasant and a revolutionary, best known as the leader of the Croatian-Slovenian peasant revolt. Before the revolt, Gubec was a serf on the estate of the landowner Franjo Tahy.[1]

When the revolt erupted, the peasants elected Matija Gubec to be one of the leaders, and renowned for his personal qualities, he became the most influentual leader of the rebelion.[1] During his brief tenure he showed ability as a capable administrator and inspiring leader that would later create a legend. He earned the nickname Gubec Beg.[1]





Matija Gubec led the peasant army during its last stand at the Battle of Stubičko Polje on 9 February 1573. Before the battle he made a speech trying to convince the men that only victory could bring them freedom, while the defeat would bring more misery. After the defeat he was captured and taken to Zagreb. On 15 February, he was publicly tortured at ST. MARK's SQUARE, forced to wear a red-hot iron crown and was subsequently quartered.



Oton Ivekovic: Killing of Matija Gubec (at the square in front of st. Mark's Church in Zagreb)


HISTORY ST. MARK'S SQUARE AND IT'S UNDERGROUND TUNNEL SYSTEM:

It is very difficult to decide which period in the town's history should be placed under the heading of "Old Zagreb", which was made popular by Djuro Szabo, the admirer of the Zagreb antiquities and the promoter of their conservation. Zagreb's origins go back into the distant past and are enveloped in the mists of legend since there are no extant manuscripts or sufficient archaeological finds from those times. It would be much easier, therefore, to take a short walk and look at Zagreb's history. In that case Old Zagreb is represented by two settlements situated on two neighboring hills: Gradec (the Upper Town) and Kaptol, with the houses lying in the valley between them along the former Medvescak Stream (today's Tkalciceva Street) and those at the beginning of VIaska Street beneath the bishopric (later archbishopric).

Although most buildings in this area do not originate from the Middle Ages, but from the 18th century, they nevertheless display the continuity of medieval urban settlements. The existence of Kaptol, the settlement on the east slope, was confirmed in 1094 when King Ladislav founded the Zagreb bishopric. The bishop, his residence and the Cathedral had their seat in the southeast part of the Kaptol hill. VIaska Ves situated in the close vicinity of the Cathedral and under the bishop's jurisdiction was first mentioned in 1198. Kaptol Street ran from the south to the north across the Kaptol terrace with canons' residences arranged in rows alongside. As the Latin word for a group or body of canons is "capitulum" (kaptol), it is clear how Kaptol got its name. The canons also ruled this settlement.

The Cathedral was consecrated in 1217, but later in 1242 it was badly damaged by the Tartar raids. After 1263 it was restored and rebuilt. As a settlement, Kaptol was an unsymmetrical rectangle which was entered at its south end in Bakaceva Street, and existed at its north end near the present day Kaptol School. In the Middle Ages Kaptol had no fortifications; it was merely enclosed with wooden fences or palisades which had been recurrently destroyed and rebuilt. The defensive walls and towers around Kaptol were built between 1469 and 1473. The Prislin Tower near the Kaptol School is one of the best-preserved from those times. In 1493 the Turks reached Sisak trying to capture it but were defeated there.

Therefore, fearing the Turkish invasion, the Bishop of Zagreb had the fortifications built around the Cathedral and his residence. The defensive towers and walls built between 1512 and 1520 have been preserved until the present day except those which were directly facing the front of the Cathedral situated at Kaptol Square. This section of the wall was pulled down in 1907. In the 13th century two Gothic churches were built in Kaptol, St. Francis with the Franciscan monastery and St. Maria's which underwent considerable reconstruction works in the 17th and the 18th centuries. In Opatovina small dwelling houses of former Kaptol inhabitants can still be seen, but at Dolac a number of little and narrow streets were pulled down in 1926 when the market place started to be built. In 1334 the canons of Zagreb established a colony of Kaptol serfs in the vicinity of their residences, north of Kaptol; that was the beginning of a new settlement called Nova Ves (the present day Nova Ves Street).

The other part of the Old Zagreb nucleus, Gradec on the Upper Town hill, was given a royal charter by King Bela in 1242. The royal charter, also called the Golden Bull, was a very important document by which Gradec was declared and proclaimed "a free royal city on Gradec, the hill of Zagreb". This act made Gradec a feudal holding responsible directly to the king. The citizens were given rights of different kinds; among other things they were entitled to elect their own "City Judge" (the mayor) and to manage their own affairs. The citizens engaged themselves in building defensive walls and towers around their settlement, fearing a new Tartar invasion. They fulfilled their obligation between 1242 and 1261. It could be rightly assumed that by building its fortification walls in the middle of the 13th century, Gradec acquired its outward appearance that can be clearly seen in today's Upper Town.

The defensive walls enclosed the settlement in the shape of a triangle, its top located near the tower called Popov Toranj and its base at the south end (the Strossmayer Promenade), which could be explained by the shape of the hill. In some places, rectangular and semicircular towers fortified the defensive walls. There were four main gates leading to the town: the Mesnicka Gate in the west, the new, later Opaticka Gate in the north, Dverce in the south and the Stone Gate in the east. The Stone Gate is the only one preserved until the present day.

Undoubtedly, the focal point of the Upper Town is the square around St. Mark's Church that had been called St. Mark's Square for years. St. Mark's Church is the parish church of Old Zagreb. The Romanesque window found in its south facade is the best evidence that the church must have been built as early as the 13th century as is also the semicircular groundplan of St. Mary's chapel (later altered). In the second half of the 14th century the church was radically reconstructed. It was then turned into a late Gothic church of the three-nave type. Massive round columns support heavy ribbed vaults cut in stone and an air of peace and sublimity characterizes the church interior in its simplicity. The most valuable part of St. Mark's Church is its south portal, considered being the work of sculptors of the family Parler from Prague (the end of the 14th century). The Gothic composition of the portal consists of fifteen effigies placed in eleven shallow niches. On top are the statues of Joseph and Mary with the infant Jesus, and below them one can see St. Mark and the Lion; the Twelve Apostles are placed on both sides of the portal (four wooden statues replaced the original ones which had been destroyed). In its artistic composition and the number of statues, this portal is the richest and the most valuable Gothic portal in South Eastern Europe. When guilds developed in Gradec in the 15th, and later in the 17th centuries, being the societies of craftsmen, their members including masters, journeymen and apprentices would gather regularly in St. Mark's Church. Outside, on the northwest wall of the church lies the oldest coat of arms of Zagreb with the year 1499 engraved in it (the original is kept in the Zagreb Town Museum).

As the corner of St. Mark's Square and the present day Cirilometodska Street, was a Town Hall, the seat of the city administration in medieval times. The building has gone through a number of alteration and reconstruction phases, and today this old Town Hall still keeps its doors open for the meetings of the Zagreb Town Council. On the opposite side of the Square at the corner of Basaritekova Street lies St. Mark's parish office. The house has been standing there since the 16th century, although it underwent reconstruction in the 18th century and had an extension added in the 19th century. At the west end of St. Mark's Square, the mansion called Dvori, the former residence of the Civil Governor of Croatia, was built at the beginning of the 19th century and yet, it can be classed among the Zagreb antiquities. The government of the Republic of Croatia meets in the Baroque mansion beside it. Since 1734, the Croatian Sabor (parliament) has taken up the east side of St. Mark's Square.

Very little is known today of the outward appearance of medieval Vlaska Street. The name of the settlement was Vlaska Ves, of Vicus Latinorum in Latin. In the old part of the present day VIaska Street, below the archbishop's residence and gardens, lies a row of houses built at the end of the 18th and the beginning of the 19th centuries, and thus the line of their facades shows the course of the old road.

In medieval documents a mention was made of watermills and public baths which existed along the Medvestak Stream in the valley between Gradec and Kaptol. The road construction in that area began in the 18th and the first half of the 19th centuries. The east bank of the stream was under the jurisdiction of Kaptol, and the west bank under Gradec.

Given that St. Mark's square was the main town square, the two century old governor's palace was built there, and in 1907, on the opposite side of the square, the parliament building was erected. that was the first case in Zagreb that applications for a building project were invited publically. the fact that the space was politically conditonned influenced the building of the underground tunnels beneith Gornji Grad, used as shelter or a potential escape route for the fascist leadership during WWII.

31.5.10

ASбECT - ASBESTOS

Asbestos (Russian: Асбест) is a town in Sverdlovsk Oblast, Russia, 86 km northeast of Yekaterinburg, named after the mineral asbestos. The city is geographically on the eastern foothills of the Central Urals on the river Bolshoy Reft (tributary of the Pyshma).



The site was created in 1889 as the settlement Koedelka at the start of the mining of the largest chrysotile (white) asbestos deposit in Russia: the Bazjenovskogo ore layer, which was discovered in 1885. Kammenaja Koedelka (Koedelkasteen) is the name for asbestos in the vernacular. In 1897 was the first Asbestos enrichment plant in Russia opened. This plant produced about 85% of all asbestos in Russia and 13% of the world. Then came some mines and in 1904 became the first narrow gauge railway to the mines laid. In subsequent years appeared more railway lines and roads. By 1917 there were four companies working in the deposit, which were all subsequently nationalized by the Soviets in 1918. In 1922, the asbestos mines in the regions Bazjenovski, and Nevjanski Rezjevski (and later Alapajevski) united under the state Ural Asbestos. From then began the systematic mining of asbestos from the ore Bazjenovskogo layer. In 1923 the volispolkom (Executive Committee volost) Asbestos transformed into a workers town board under the jurisdiction of the district Belojarski. In 1931 the asbestos industry under the jurisdiction of the People's Commissariat of Heavy Industry on top. On June 10 of that year the workers settlement asbestos as an independent district under the jurisdiction moved from the oblispolkom (implementation committee of the oblastraad of delegates to work) of Oblast Urals and on June 20, 1933 got the status of town under the jurisdiction of the oblast .
In 1936, the town has a railway station. In 1938, 4 Ural asbestos mines and enrichment plants 4. During the war, in 1942, the factory was founded OeralATI where asbestos products are made since then. In 1950 the only Institute for Asbestos Asbestos Industry of the Soviet Union. The asbestos production was further increased after the war in relation to an increased demand by industry. In 1958 the main asbestos producer and Canada surpassed it in 1969, No 6 factory built, the largest asbestos enrichment plant in the world. In 1971 exceeded the population of the city including surrounding areas under the jurisdiction despite the 100,000 inhabitants. In 1997 the city got a new road to the place Belojarski south of it.

The Bazjenovskogo-deposit is the largest asbestos layer of Russia. The asbestos mine (surface) is 11.5 km long and 1.8 km wide, almost 300 meters deep and covers an area where approximately 90 km ². Over 10,000 employees Urals Asbestos mining here has more than 500,000 tons of chrysotile asbestos. [2] Currently Ural Best, consisting of 19 factories and workshops is the largest producer of asbestos in the world and in 2003 was Russia with an annual production of 870,000 tonnes well top the list of Asbestos producers, which was 60% in Russia was deposed. [3] Ural Asbestos is thus one of the fiercest opponents of restrictions on the use of Asbestos, as the law of the European Union, which decreed that any Asbestos banned in 2005 from the EU regarding the risk of several cancer types by people who come into contact with loose particles of the mineral. The asbestos industry is very important to the city, where 10% of the population works and 70% of households have someone working. It is therefore sometimes called an example of a monogorod.
In 2007 the Ural Asbestos in collaboration with the SUAL group started the construction of a large magnesium factory in the city.
Other factories are OeralATI Asbestos, Zaretsjny, Asbostroj, a chicken factory (Asbestovskaja) and a plant for concrete. In asbestos include asbestos, brick, china, furniture, and metal structures produced.

Translated by Google Translation

14.2.10

HIGHWAY ACROSS AN ANTITANK CANAL

The antitank canal offers fine riding from Oelegem on the Albert Canal to Sint-Job-in-'t-Goor on the Turnhout. Combined with the Albert west to Schoten and then the Turnhout northeast to Sint-Job, you have a nice loop of 40 km. This is marked in the clockwise direction "Waterwegenroute", and is route 46 in the GeoCart cycle guide for Antwerp province.

The antitank canal (the line of squares north and east of Antwerpen on the Kempen map) was constructed as a defense (modern moat) for Antwerp. At the east end it started from the Albert canal at Oelegem and ran northwest though Schilde, 's-Gravenwezel, St.-Job-in-'t-Goor, Schoten, Brasschaat, Kapellen, Putte, and Stabroek to Berendrecht at the north end of the port of Antwerp. The overall length is 46 km, bottom width 5 m, with a water depth of 2 meters. The embankments of either side were 14 to 18 m wide. Due to a difference in water level of 15 m over the 45 km, 17 fortified locks (sluisbunkers) (actually fortified culverts) were required. It was finished in the first weeks of 1940.
The canal was only the latest in numerous attempts to protect Antwerp from invaders. There had been two different city walls. Then in the years before WW1 a ring of eighteen forts was built around the city. The antitank canal (or ditch) was designed to strengthen six of the forts by connecting them with a modern moat that would be capable of stopping tanks. And as with all other passive defenses, from the Walls of Jericho to Hitler's Atlantic Wall, the antitank canal was a failure against a determined army. The German forces did not attack Antwerp at all in their charge to the sea.

In 1948 most of the canal was filled. In the early 1970s an Antwerp bypass canal using the antitank canal route was proposed. Barge convoys of up to 9,000 tons could travel from the Albert to the north end of the Antwerp docks. Highway bridges (including the E34) were (re)built with that in mind. However, NIMBY (Not in My Back Yard) protests led to indefinite postponement. In 1985 renovation of the original canal was started. The fill was removed, and a crushed limestone biker/hiker path laid between St.-Job-in-'t-Goor and Oelegem. This was later marked as part of the Waterwegenroute.

The path runs practically straight from the Albert Canal. From the peak of the intended junction on the Albert (junction 56), follow the limestone path north toward junction 57 under the E34 bridge. In about 2 km (just past junction 57, direction 26) you reach the first fort, named Oelegem for the neighboring town. The area is now privately owned and a nature preserve. The fort itself houses a bat colony. A bit over 2 km later (past junction 26 direction 45) near Koeputten you reach a lunette - a strong point. The fortifications have been partly destroyed. The area is now used by a fishing club. Two km further is another fort, 's-Gravenwezel. This is a designated recreation zone that has been partly taken over by illegal county houses. Nearly 4 km later past junction 42 direction 41 you reach the north end of the path at St-Job-in-'t-Goor where you turn right and then left to the bridge over the Turnhout Canal (junction 41). (Route description based on material from André Maes December 2002) (Junction numbers added 21 November 2008)
Dan Gamber

27.10.09

THE NEW HA-HA

The 18 th century English garden appears as a sort of middle landscape, a naturalistic composition mediating between culture and wilderness. John Dixon Hunt writes that the key to the garden is enclosure, a separation between it and not-it. The picturesque garden blurs this separation with the invention of the ha-ha: a trench ringing the garden, its outer side sloping and turfed, the inner side a vertical stone wall. Viewed from within the garden, the ha-ha disappears into the landscape, making an unbroken vista of the garden and its surroundings. Walpole in 1785, in his Essay on Modern Gardening, gives an etymology for this strange term: "the common people called them Ha! Ha’s! to express their surprize at finding a sudden and unperceived check to their walk."

In an age where monuments and prominent buildings are viewed as perpetually subject to attack, where fortification must co-exist with dynamic urban sites, and where the landscape designer is asked once again to artfully confound, the ha-ha has become relevant again. Although we are accustomed to seeing systems of control as metaphysical rather than physical structures, the fortification of American cities since the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing reminds us that control, under threat, must manifest itself. The construction of U.S. embassies in the new age of terror is illustrative. Circa 2003, as Berlin emerged from a decade of reconstruction following reunification, the rebuilt Pariser Platz was lined with branch offices of major governments and banks. But the site of the U.S. embassy, vacant since the Second World War, lay fallow in the shadow of the Brandenburg Gate, mired in security negotiations. Until 2008, the embassy operated out of temporary quarters off Unter den Linden, surrounded by an astonishing array of concrete bollards, guard booths, lift-arm gates, Jersey barriers and fencing. Amid the formal neoclassical order of central Berlin, the embassy conveyed a shocking image of power under siege.
The new embassy finally opened in May 2008. With its steel bollards, which extend across and block the street in front, it cuts a bulkier profile than its glassy-walled neighbor, the Gehry-designed DZ Bank headquarters. Design architect John Ruble was quoted by Bloomberg as saying "Pariser Platz has been completely redesigned to address the security issue in a way that’s not visible. It looks like a normal part of the city." Here design is called into service to mediate between enclosure and openness just as the ha-ha once softened the boundaries of the garden. The picturesque garden was developed in a century when the English countryside was undergoing a massive transformation. The Commons system of shared land-use succumbed to enclosure, causing radical economic and social upheavals. England, according to David Watkin, is "a country which has specialised in preserving the picturesque facades of ancient institutions whilst making fundamental changes to the reality behind them." The ha-ha disguises changes in relations between Lord and tenant. When viewed from the manor house, whose garden it encircles, it acts as a symbolic mediation.
Today, the image of the city as a system of circulation is compromised by the image of the city as fortress. Landscape architects are called upon to aestheticize the rude barriers surrounding potential targets, as in the NoGo designed by Rogers Marvel for the front of the New York Stock Exchange: faceted bronze over steel bollards, publicized with photographs of children climbing on them. More sophisticated design work secures the monumental government core in Washington. For half a decade, an uneven ring of Jersey barriers prominently encircled the Washington Monument, until a proposal by Olin Partnership was realized. Now, a low ha-ha, designed in the form of a continuous bench, surrounds the monument to protect it from vehicular assault.
The project of naturalizing security features is highly developed in the new rash of architecturally ambitious Federal Courthouses erected in cities like Seattle, San Francisco, and Minneapolis under the General Services Administration Design Excellence program. Although their plazas aim for a more pastoral environment, the buildings resemble the sterile tower-in-plaza style of
late 20th century American urbanism. The landscapes are ingenious in design: Martha Schwartz’s system of tear-shaped mounds, inspired by glacial drumlins, gives a Teletubbies landscape quality to the front of the new courthouse in Minneapolis, while preventing vehicles from reaching the building’s walls. The plaza itself is a thin sheet over an excavated pit, designed to carry visitors on foot and to collapse under heavier loads (such as a Ryder truck filled with fertilizer). This solution, known as the Tiger Trap, is invisible until you’re in it: Ha! Ha!

Written by Eric Fredericksen

20.10.09

WE ALMOST LOST DETROIT

The Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear power plant on the shore of Lake Erie near Monroe, in Frenchtown Charter Township, Monroe County, Michigan, USA, approximately halfway between Detroit, Michigan and Toledo, Ohio. Two units have been constructed on this site. The first unit's construction started in 1963, and the second unit reached criticality in 1988.

The 94 MWe prototype fast breeder reactor Fermi 1 unit operated at the site from 1957 to 1972. On October 5, 1966 Fermi 1 suffered a partial fuel meltdown. There was no abnormal radiation release to the public, and no one was injured. At the time of the accident, two fuel rod subassemblies reached high temperatures of around 700°F (with an expected range near 580°F), causing an alarm.
Following an extended shutdown that involved fuel replacement and cleanup, Fermi 1 continued to operate until September 22, 1972. It was officially decommissioned December 31, 1975. It is currently in SAFSTOR with a gradual "final" decommissioning in progress. Details of the accident are verified by the book Fermi-1 New Age for Nuclear Power[2] published by the American Nuclear Society in 1979. It also led to a book by John Grant Fuller (subtitled "This Is Not A Novel")[3] and a song by Gil Scott-Heron, both titled We Almost Lost Detroit.



It stands out on a highway
like a Creature from another time.
It inspires the babies' questions,
"What's that?"
For their mothers as they ride.
But no one stopped to think about the babies
or how they would survive,
and we almost lost Detroit
this time.
How would we ever get over
loosing our minds?
Just thirty miles from Detroit
stands a giant power station.
It ticks each night as the city sleeps
seconds from anniahlation.
But no one stopped to think about the people
or how they would survive,
and we almost lost Detroit
this time.
How would we ever get over
over loosing our minds?
The sherrif of Monroe county had,
sure enough disasters on his mind,
and what would karen Silkwood say
if she was still alive?
That when it comes to people's safety
money wins out every time.
and we almost lost Detroit
this time, this time.
How would we ever get over
over loosing our minds?
You see, we almost lost Detroit
that time.
Almost lost Detroit
that time.
And how would we ever get over...
Cause odds are,
we gonna loose somewhere, one time.
Odds are
we gonna loose somewhere sometime.
And how would we ever get over
loosing our minds?
And how would we ever get over
loosing our minds?
Didn't they, didn't they decide?
Almost lost Detroit
that time.
Damn near totally destroyed,
one time.
Didn't all of the world know?
Say didn't you know?
Didn't all of the world know?
Say didn't you know?
We almost lost detroit...
Gil Scott-Heron

28.9.09

THOREAU'S COVE

Walden Pond is a 102-foot (31 m) deep pond.[1] It is 61 acres (250,000 m2) in area and 1.7 miles (2.7 km) around, located in Concord, Massachusetts, in the United States. A famous example of a kettle hole, it was formed by retreating glaciers 10,000 - 12,000 years ago.

In 1845, Thoreau went to live and work at Walden Pond. He stayed for two years, keeping a journal of his thoughts and his encounters with nature and society. Over the next few years, Thoreau wrote and rewrote (seven drafts in all) Walden; or Life in the Woods, one of the most famous works in American literature. Published in 1854, this classic has never been out of print and is still read by people all over the world. Until his death in 1862, Thoreau combined surveying, lecturing, and writing; in 1849, at the height of the anti-slavery struggle, he published On the Duty of Civil Disobedience, (a lecture originally entitled Resistance to Civil Government). Many years later, this essay inspired Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, and other nonviolent protesters.

Thoreau became increasingly involved with the social and political issues of his time. He often spoke out against economic injustice and slavery, refusing to pay taxes to a government that supported slavery. With other members of his family, Thoreau helped runaway slaves escape to freedom in Canada. He opposed the government for waging the Mexican war; he delivered an abolitionist lecture, Slavery in Massachusetts. He even supported John Brown's efforts to end slavery after meeting him in Concord, defending his character after Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry, in A Plea for Captain John Brown.

On May 6, 1862 at the age of 44, the self-appointed inspector of snowstorms and rainstorms and author renowned for motivating the world to value our natural environment, died after a prolonged struggle with tuberculosis. He is buried on Authors' Ridge at Sleepy Hollow Cemetery in Concord.

25.8.09

SINKHOLE IN GUATEMALA CITY

GUATEMALA CITY, Guatemala, February 2007 - A 330-foot-deep sinkhole killed three people, swallowed about a dozen homes, and forced the evacuation of nearly 1,000 people in a crowded Guatemala City neighborhood. Officials blamed the sinkhole on recent rains and an underground sewage flow from a ruptured main.

When the pit appeared, it emitted foul odors, loud noises and tremors, shaking the surrounding ground. A rush of water could be heard from its depths, and authorities feared it could widen or others could open up.

The dead were identified as Irma and David Soyos, emergency spokesman Juan Carlos Bolanos said. Their bodies were found near the sinkhole, floating in a river of sewage. Their father, Domingo, was later found dead in the enormous fissure.

Authorities had apparently suspected something was wrong with the site before the sinkhole appeared.

“We knew, and the INSIVUMEH (the country’s seismology institute) had placed a seismic meter there,” said Alvaro Rodas, the director of social development for Guatemala City. “The city government had contracted a robotic camera system to go down there, but the disaster occurred first.”

Cristobal Colon, a spokesman for the municipal water authority, said the sewage main ruptured after becoming clogged. He said the city was aware of the blockage and the army had been considering a controlled explosion to clear the pipe, which carries both rainwater and sewage for much of the capital.

Source: Associated Press

MANHOLE LID BLOWS OFF

23.8.09

SEWERS OF THE WORLD

A collection of photographic images of manhole and other access covers to water and gas pipes, electrical and telecommunication cables, etc., including gutters and grillwork (whether constructed of cast iron, welded or forged, or made from wood or stone) related to sewers of all kinds.
http://sewers.artinfo.ru/exhibition/exhib-e.htm

ATLES-F SITES

The Atlas-F missile sites were activated in 1961, and after a short operational period, were decommissioned in 1965. These sites were the first of the "super hardened" missile silos, built to withstand a 200 pound per square inch blast. Atlas F (structure only) construction costs range from $14 to $18 each in 1960’s dollars.

Missile Silo: The missile silo is a huge structure 52 ft. inside diameter and approximately 176 feet deep. Access is from a 40 foot tunnel with 3 blast doors leading from the LCC. The Missile Silo has 2 overhead 90 ton doors that can often be reopened. There were originally 7 floor levels inside the silo, however app, 2/3 of the F silos have been salvaged out and only bare walls remain. Multiple levels could be rebuilt in the silo. A deck built in the silo would provide almost 2,000 sq. ft. of floor-space.
Land: Land sizes with the Atlas-F series vary greatly, due to post-government division. The minimum typical acreage is 5 acres, although some are still deeded with the original 10-22 acres the government used. Originally, the inner 5 acres of these sites were surrounded by a 8 ft. barbed wire topped chain-link security fence. This fence remains on some sites. There are two concrete (quonset) pads 40 ft. by 100 ft. on each site. An antenna silo, 8 ft. diameter and 29 ft deep, remains in the ground on each site.





22.8.09

BEIJING'S UNDERGROUND HIDEOUT

With the Soviets breathing down his country's metaphorical neck, Chairman Mao ordered the construction of a vast underground city to serve as a shelter during an invasion, air raid or nuclear war.
This was no minor undertaking. In the late 1960s, the population of Beijing reached 7.5 million residents [source: CPIRC]. In short order, the residents of the capital city were put to work excavating their enormous air raid shelter. Most of the digging was done by hand, and the work was shared by adults and schoolchildren alike. This communal venture fit nicely into Chairman Mao's Cultural Revolution -- a massive campaign to support the communist movement and thwart counterrevolutionary ideas. From 1969 to 1979, the people of Beijing focused their attention underground.



When the Dixia Cheng (underground city) was completed, it was capable of housing 300,000 people for about four months [source: Time]. Between 26 to 60 feet (8 to 18 m) beneath the city, tunnels stretch about 18 miles (approximately 30 km) in length and spread over a more than 52 square mile area (85 square km) [source: Zhiyong]. Ancient city gates throughout the city were recycled into construction material for the tunnels. Secret entrances aboveground were located in shops, homes and parks around Beijing. A map of the tunnels drawn using a fluorescent medium to render it invisible to the naked (Soviet) eye was found on the wall of one of these shops [source: Lonely Planet].
The massive bomb shelter complex was never used for its intended purpose. Had the occasion arisen, the Beijing residents who made it underground wouldn't have died easily. The Dixia Cheng is outfitted with ventilation shafts that resist fallout from nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) weapons. In addition to the safety provided by the depth of the tunnels, the complex is outfitted with bomb shelters. Other chambers in auxiliary tunnels held grain, weapons and other supplies. The underground city also has sites for growing sunless crops like mushrooms and areas prepared for well drilling [source: Zhiyong].
Subterranean dwellers wouldn't have died of boredom, either. Classrooms were constructed for the children living in the underground city, and amenities found aboveground like a movie theater, barber shops, restaurants and a roller skating rink were all awaiting the flood of Beijingers seeking shelter underground from Soviet bombs.
After the USSR disintegrated, and Beijing was no longer under the threat of attack, the underground city lost its purpose. Its existence faded into obscurity and conjecture. In 2000, the Dixia Cheng found new life as a tourist destination (it's inexplicably not open to Chinese visitors). Most of the complex is shut off; a mere fraction of it is open to tours, and some businesses have set up shop in the open areas. A few air raid shelters are now hostels for thrifty travelers. Urban explorers' unsanctioned investigations of the untouched portions of the tunnels have yielded reports of a labyrinth frozen in time: posters of Chairman Mao still adorning walls of rooms where bunk beds stand silently [source: CNN].
As the 2008 Olympics approached, Beijing officials reinvigorated districts in the city. This included tearing down some of the shops that housed the most well-known entrances to the underground city. Some are fearful that the Dixia Cheng will be lost forever: Without entrances and the luminescent map to show the way, Beijing's Dixia Cheng may return to its shroud of secrecy.

taken from: http://geography.howstuffworks.com/asia/beijing-underground-city1.htm

THE UNDERGROUND MAN FINDS WORLD CLOSING IN ON NANTUCKET

NANTUCKET, MA - For 10 years, Thomas Johnson lived cocooned in an
underground bunker he called ''my self-help tank.''

Yesterday, the world began to intrude.

As news of Johnson's life as a subterranean hermit spread around this island yesterday, federal and state law enforcement agents made their way to his hideaway. Armed with a pistol, the agents approached Johnson as he was about to reenter his 8-foot-deep, three-room home yesterday afternoon and asked for the barn owl's wings and the talons of a red-tailed hawk they saw photographed in yesterday's Globe. Both are illegal keepsakes. Johnson surrendered what he called ''priceless totems'' to the agents, but only after a distraught, angry exchange with an agent from the US Fish and Wildlife Service and an armed sergeant from the state Environmental Police. The authorities said they would recommend that he not be prosecuted. To Johnson, such news is small comfort for a man who fears reemerging from a world where he purposely shunned a materialistic society he abhors. After spending 2 1/2 years in an Italian prison for carrying heroin in a drug deal, Johnson said, he fled back to the United States to fashion an uncomplicated, self-dependent life. Underground in the woods, Johnson explained, he could commune with nature and create a radical lifestyle that would free him from the routine burdens of modern life and allow him to grow stronger morally. ''I'm not a religious nut - I'm not another Randy Weaver,'' said Johnson, referring to the ntigovernment zealot whose wife and son were killed in a standoff with federal agents in Idaho. An FBI agent was also killed. ''I'm a dignified person. I'm not a dog. I'm not an animal - and that's what some people would like to make me.'' ''This is my self-help tank,'' he added, looking admiringly around his comfortable home. ''I've gone into the earth, almost like a seed to regerminate.'' Even as authorities intensified their scrutiny of Johnson, the travails of the sometime-woodworker and house painter generated considerable support on an island where building development has made housing less and less affordable. 'Everybody I've talked to so far has said, `All right!''' said Wayne Viera, a former selectman who drives a cab, sells real estate, and carves scrimshaw to make a living. ''The year-round people know the hoops you have to go through to get housing.'' Chet Curtis, the WCVB-TV anchorman who owns about 5 acres of undeveloped land close to the bunker, said he is inclined to support Johnson's wish to remain in his home. ''He's not bothering anybody,'' said Curtis, who arrived on Nantucket yesterday. ''I thought it was incredible that he had accomplished this.'' Authorities informed Curtis and his wife and co-anchor, Natalie Jacobson, a couple of weeks ago that Johnson's dwelling might be on their land. At the time, Curtis said, his feeling was that ''if he's on our property, and he's not hurting anybody, why not leave him alone.'' A surveyor later placed Johnson's structure within the Boy Scouts' Camp Richard. Nantucket officials said the bunker has health code violations and poses a danger to people who might walk on top of it. They have drawn up a list of violations, such as inappropriate toilet facilities and no water under
pressure, but appeared to have taken no other steps to force him to leave. The home, which is furnished with a queen-size bed, TV, stone stove, refrigerator, kitchen, and makeshift shower and toilet, was discovered by a deer hunter who stumbled over a stovepipe that protrudes a foot above ground. Boy Scout officials from the Cape Cod Council, which also covers Nantucket, could not be reached for comment. Nantucket health inspector Richard Ray has said he believes the Scouts plan to begin eviction proceedings that could take up to 90 days to complete. However, Police Chief Randolph Norris said it is his understanding that the Boy Scouts intend to let Johnson stay. Johnson said he has chosen another underground site on Nantucket if he is forced to move. Such a prospect wouldn't distress Steve Tornovish, co-owner of the Thrifty car rental agency here. ''I'd let him do it in my yard, but my family and dog might be upset,'' Tornovish said. ''I'm something of the opinion: No harm, no foul.'' However, he added, Nantucket has many well-to-do landowners with big tax bills who ''will be riled up'' about Johnson's tax-free alternative. Dennis Kelley, a construction worker from Hyannis who works on Nantucket during the week, empathized with that thinking.''He's been here for 10 years? How about paying back some rent or giving some money to the Boy Scouts?'' Kelley said. ''Some townspeople are very upset. They've got a $2 million to $3 million house, and here's this guy
living tax-free.'' Whatever the outcome of Johnson's saga, the emergence of what some townspeople are calling ''the subterranean guy'' is viewed as one more colorful chapter in island lore. ''This takes the expression of `going underground' to a whole new level,'' Tornivish said. ''But you know, Nantucket is an island of characters. And the story of this guy is just another example.'' Johnson shudders at the thought that he might become an island attraction. As the environmental authorities approached him, Johnson tossed aside camouflage brush from the hatch to his home, pointed to the earth-covered dwelling, and said, ''This is the trouble I went to for peace, and the last thing it'll get me is peace.''

By Brian MacQuarrie

HIDEOUTS

The Hideouts

ONE day early in 1941 two Army officers walked across a pasture on Charing Hill, above the village of Charing in Kent, through a flock of grazing sheep to a weatherbeaten wooden feeding trough on the far side. Ahead of them the hill dropped away sharply, and the broad view to the south, across Ashford to the English Channel, made them both gasp. The younger officer, Captain Norman Field, suggested to the older one, General Montgomery, that they should rest for a few minutes. Why not sit on the feeding trough and enjoy the view? The General nodded and they sat down side by side. After several minutes of silence the general turned to say something, but-Field was gone.

Montgomery looked around. He could see nothing near by to hide behind, and yet Field had certainly not had time to run out of sight. Where was he?Charing Hill rabbit holes

He heard the younger officer's voice. It seemed to rise up from the ground. Montgomery jerked around in time to see Norman Field's head bob up beside him-through a rectangular opening in the bottom of the sheep trough.

The General's sharp features relaxed into a grin. He had been told about the Auxiliary Units organisation when he was commanding troops around Brighton, but when he had taken over command of XII Corps from Andrew Thorne, nobody had thought to tell him that there was a Resistance organisation in Kent that was at least as elaborate as the one in Sussex. Only now, after ten months in command of the corps, was he making his first inspection of Auxiliary Units installations, and even this inspection would probably never have come about but for a misunderstanding.

When Norman Field had taken over from Peter Fleming as Auxiliary Units Intelligence Officer in Kent, Fleming had told him that when he wanted to go on leave he need only arrange it with Coleshill and then, as a courtesy, should telephone the Corps Commander to explain how long he would be away. However, when Field telephoned the corps to report that he was going on leave he was put on to General Montgomery, and the general was at first mystified and then very angry. For no one had told him that XII Corps possessed such a thing as an 'Observation Unit', and he knew nothing at all about Field's existence either.

Field explained what the unit was, and the General became even more angry. Had these people in Kent laid mines and booby traps that could be set off by civilians-perhaps even children? Norman Field hastily assured him that there were no mines, but Montgomery wanted to see for himself what the Resistance organisation was doing-hence the visit to the sheep trough.

Captain Field showed the general the secret catch in the bottom of the trough, a nailhead that sprung the trapdoor. He showed him how he wriggled through the small aperture, down into a hiding place carved in the earth beneath them. The room, not much more than six feet long, was a two-nun observation post. Its windows were just below the crest of the hill and were a great deal older than the dugout itself. They had originally been rabbit holes, which is what they still looked like from outside, although they had been carefully glazed and were now weatherproof They gave a clear view across the valley for miles.

This hideout, like so many of the others that astonished General Montgomery that day in Kent, was a monument to the ingenuity of Peter Fleming. New officers brought into the Auxiliary Units organisation were usually sent to stay at The Garth for several days so that they could see them, and they became the prototypes for Resistance hideouts all over Britain.

Officially they were known as 'operational bases'. The word 'hideout', the officers who ran the Resistance soon decided, suggested a more passive purpose than that for which these bases had been constructed, and if overheard by the Germans or their friends, would not alert them to their intended use.  

Auxiliary Units hideouts were supposed to be merely the places to which Resistance men could withdraw to eat, sleep and lie low. However, some of the first hideouts in Kent appear to have been built with sieges in mind, for they had their own early-warning outposts several hundred yards away, connected to them by hidden telephone wires. And several of the hideouts in Kent were, like the one entered through the sheep trough, built primarily as lookout points.

By the end Of 1940 about 300 hideouts were already in use around the country, and another 61 were ready by the spring of 1941. There were some 534 by the end of that year, and although no later figures are available, upwards of a thousand existed at the time that the Auxiliary Units patrols were disbanded. No two were identical, but most were eventually made large enough to house six or seven men in reasonable comfort, although many at first were little more than fox-holes with log roofs, so badly ventilated that candles sputtered from lack of oxygen and the men who tried sleeping in them all night awoke with headaches. Each hideout was eventually fitted with bunks, cooking stoves, Tilley lamps and other comforts provided by the Army, and each was stocked with food and water-in some cases sufficient to sustain a patrol for as long as a month. Wherever dampness was a problem the tinned foods were frequently replaced so that there was never a chance of besieged Auxiliary Units patrols being finished off by food poisoning. Most hideouts had plenty of room for the patrols' arms, ammunition and sabotage material, but in some areas subsidiary hides were dug near by to hold these and additional stores of food. Many of the hideouts eventually had chemical lavatories, and a few even had running water and some rudimentary form of drainage. The hideouts were so well concealed that anyone walking over them would not notice that the ground beneath their feet had been hollowed out, or that it was unusual in any way. And of course the hideouts had to be made impossible to detect from the air.

Operational Base diagram

Undoubtedly the greatest problem was that of digging the hideouts without anyone noticing-not even the members of neighbouring Resistance patrols. In most of the coastal areas the first hideouts had to be dug by the Resistance men themselves, stumbling around late at night and in total darkness. Incredibly, they usually managed to finish the job unnoticed, but anyone who happened across a half-completed hideout had to be fobbed off with some sort of story that would put an end to questions. The usual cover story was that the hole was being dug for the storage of emergency food supplies for a secret government department'- a story that did not make much sense at the time but did stop people asking questions and usually stopped them talking. Speculation about the 'food stores' still continues in some areas of Britain today, and there are dark rumours about how 'They' were going to look after themselves all right.

Another major problem which faced the men who built the hideouts was that of disposing of the subsoil which they had brought up. Carting this away in the dark was no easy task, especially when one remembers that a cubic foot of earth weighs just over a hundred pounds, and the average Resistance hideout in Britain was about twenty feet long, at least ten feet wide, and always high enough for its occupants to stand erect in it.

Many of the methods which were worked out for scattering the spoil in Kent was taken up in other counties, but each new hideout presented new problems. Sometimes the men simply scooped away topsoil in a wood, replaced it with the spoil from their hideout, covered this with the original topsoil and laboriously replanted all the undergrowth. In Devon and Cornwall they some- times carried out the spoil a bucketful at a time and poured it into streams. At Wickhambreaux in Kent. near the mouth of the River Stour, earth from an Auxiliary Units patrol's hideout was moved across the river on an aerial ropeway and added to a fill that had been begun by the Kent River board as an anti-flood barrier long before Auxiliary Units people appeared on the scene. Not far away, in Stocking Wood, near Baddlesmere, about three miles south of Faversham, the chalky sub-soil was so hard to hide that Norman Field hit on a particularly ingenious solution to the problem. He told his men to put the subsoil in a natural hole in the wood, and he used a camouflet set to mine it. He then placed a line of the sets across the wood and, the next time German bombers flew over, detonated all the charges. What followed looked and sounded like a stick of bombs exploding, and no one questioned the appearance of the chalky craters in the wood.

When Captain Field decided to place an underground observation post on the bare crest of Charing Hill, at a point that could be seen from all directions, he had to solve both the problems of surreptitious digging and soil disposal. After giving the matter a lot of thought he and his men borrowed an anti-aircraft gun, placed it on the spot they had picked for their observation post. and then started filling sandbags to shield it, using for this the earth that they scooped from around the base of the gun. Then, shielded from view by the sandbags, they finished digging the observation post and camouflaging its entrance. For several weeks they manned the gun, and then an Army truck came to tow it away and to cart off the sandbags. This in itself was not unusual, for the guns were often moved from one place to another. All that remained on Charing Hill was a perfectly concealed hideout.

Resistance men for various reasons did not always dig their own hideouts. In several areas they were dug for them by members of Royal Engineer tunnelling companies or simply by ordinary sapper soldiers, and the men in the patrols dug only the entrance tunnels. When the hideouts were dug for the patrols by the soldiers who had been sent from Coleshill to train them, these troops made the entrances, too, and the men who were to use the hideouts were taken into their vicinities and told to find them. This they never did.

In at least one instance civilian labour had to be contracted to produce some hideouts. This happened on the Romney Marsh, where the hideouts were sited below sea-level and only experts could do the sort of concreting that would result in water-tight construction. In those days navvies in provincial areas were rarely transported great distances to their work, but the ones who built the hideouts on the Romney Marsh were brought in from the other side of Kent-and were never given the time to learn their way around the area, so that probably they would not have been able to find their ways back to the hideouts again.

Flooding was a problem in other places as well. On the Essex Marshes, just west of the Blackwater, several patrols each dug and provisioned four successive hideouts, each time hoping that they had at last beaten the problem of flooding, and each time finding that they had not.

Not all the hideouts were fresh excavations. One of Peter Fleming's best was an enlarged badger sett on the edge of a chalk pit at Challock, seven miles south of Faversham, Kent, and another had been the cellars of Evington Manor, at Hastingleigh, near Wye, long before destroyed by fire. The members of one of Reginald Sennitt’s patrols on the Essex Marshes who suffered repeated floodings finally recalled that an isolated farmhouse on high ground in the area had a cellar which had been scaled off from the house itself for many years. And so instead of digging themselves yet another hideout, the patrol's members tunnelled from a briar bush several hundred yards from the house into the cellar which, as they had hoped, was completely dry. At no time did the two elderly women who lived in the house have any idea of what was going on down below.

The so-called smugglers' caves along the coasts of Devon and Cornwall were unacceptable as hideouts because they were so well known and were always, even during the war, likely to be visited by tourists. Certainly the Germans would have had no trouble pinpointing them. However, on the Isle of Thanet in Kent the tunnels and underground rooms believed to have been carved in the chalk in the heyday of smuggling are less well known, and the Thanet Resistance group headed by a Manston Grove farmer, Norman Steed, turned several of the excavations into excellent hideouts. When he discovered an old tunnel that reached from the edge of Manston Aerodrome (at that time one of Britain's most important RAF advance fighter stations), right under the runways, he called in his Intelligence Officer to explore it with him. Fifty yards along the tunnel they came to a fall that blocked it completely, and the officer decided to send in a team of sappers to dig it out. Cleared, the tunnel would provide Resistance saboteurs with a perfect way in and out of the aerodrome. How- ever, before the sappers began their work a stray German bomb landed in the middle of the airfield; the only damage it caused was to block the tunnel permanently.

In Wales abandoned coal mines, forgotten even by most of the miners, were turned into excellent hideouts. The Welsh Resistance men, although friendly enough with the English and Scots they met at Coleshill, were reluctant to show their hideouts to Intelligence Officers from the headquarters, and they would not unless flatly ordered to do so. Yet these Welshmen were certainly not all recluses; one had been a rugby international and had been capped for Wales about fifteen times, another had been champion grenade thrower of the BEF in the First World War, and yet another had won the Victoria Cross in that war. But the Welsh, like the Resistance men on the Isle of Wight, hated sharing their deepest secrets with 'foreigners'.

Mine workings were also used as hideouts by patrols in other parts of the country-coal mines in the North-cast and, in Corn- wall, abandoned tin mines nearly a quarter of a mile deep and in constant danger of caving in because their timbers were rotting, and in which echoed the angry roar of subterranean streams.

In both Cornwall and Scotland, old ice houses and ice pits were taken over and made habitable hideouts, and in the north of Scotland several 2,ooo-year-old Pictish dwellings were used. Known only to the shepherds, each of these underground dome- shaped rooms had to be entered through a hole in its top which was covered with a weathered stone. All these dwellings needed was a good sweeping, and after the war they were simply abandoned.

One of the most spectacular hideouts built in Kent by Peter Fleming was intended not as a base for a single patrol but was to be a collecting point for stray Resistance men on the run. It contained food, water and sleeping accommodation for about 120 people. Nor was the sheet bulk of this hideout its only unique feature. Fleming had discovered a boat-shaped depression in King's Wood, in a cleft in the hills above The Garth, about sixty feet long, thirty feet wide and thirty deep. Local people told him that this hole had been dug during the First World War as a landing place for an airship. Whether or not this was true, Fleming reasoned that the last place the Germans would look for a secret hole in the earth was underneath a well-known one. He therefore had the bottom scooped out of the airship hole, built a shelter in it, and the earth was replaced.The Airship Hole

Any entrance into this hideout through the airship hole itself would have been conspicuous, especially after 120 people on the run had trampled a fresh path down into it. Fortunately an old footpath happened to run alongside the hole, about fifteen yards away from its rim. On the edge of this path Fleming had his men dig a vertical shaft to the depth of the shelter's floor, and a low tunnel was cut between the two. The trapdoor for this entrance was a tree trunk nearly six feet high and weighing about half a ton. It was fixed into place so that when 'unlocked' it could be swung aside at the touch of a finger. The underground counterbalances that supported this lid were later duplicated in several other areas.

Another of Fleming's hideouts on the North Downs in Kent had an even more ingenious method of approach. Anyone wishing to use it had first to find a marble that was hidden in some leaves neat by. This then had to be inserted into what appeared to be a mousehole. The marble would roll down a pipe about twelve feet long and plop into a tin can, a signal to the men inside that they should open the trapdoor. The trap itself was concealed in the gnarled, ivy-covered roots at the base of an ancient tree.

Another hideout near Woolton in Kent, just south of the junction of the Dover and Folkestone roads, was built in 1941 by a company of Welsh miners. It was entered through the false bottom of a manger against the side of a hill. Yet another in Kent was under a brickyard at Lydden, about a mile south of Margate, on a site now occupied by an industrialised housing estate. It was entered by moving away a section of what appeared to be a solid wooden wall. But the most common trapdoors on the hideouts were simply oak or elm boxes filled with a foot-thick layer of earth. Most of these trapdoors had to be lifted out, and to make this easier, many of them were mounted on steel springs that, when a hidden catch was pushed, raised the tray enough for a man to get his fingers under its rim. All along the coasts of Britain many hideouts could be entered through what appeared to be cucumber frames, often with the plants actually growing on the trapdoors. One hideout in Scremerston, in Northumberland, just south of Berwick-on-Tweed, was entered through a wood- pile; the right twig had simply to be tweaked and an entire section of the pile would slide away. Peter Fleming's badger sett was entered by lifting the rotting remains of what had been a farm cart which long ago had lost its wheels. Because the cart body was so heavy, it was mounted on underground counter-balances.

Several of the trapdoors were inadvertently discovered during the war; one of them in a wood near Great Leighs, Essex, by a courting couple. They suddenly felt the ground begin to move beneath them. When they found out why, in some alarm they notified the police who in turn notified the Army, and that hide- out was no longer used.

Certainly everything possible was done to keep the hideouts inconspicuous. Most were sited in woods, often where the under- growth looked so dense that even animals could not get through it. Frequently the trapdoors of the hideouts were at the edges of footpaths, so that as long as the men who used them were careful, they could remove and replace the trapdoors without ever actually stepping off the paths. To reach a hideout in a cave in Scotland, on the Bowes-Lyons estates in Berwickshire, the Resistance men had to scale a sheer cliff overhanging a river, then leap into the cave through a waterfall. Officers from Coleshill who visited this hideout were given a sumptuous dinner of fresh salmon poached from a stretch of a river where the fishing rights were owned by the King's brother-in-law.

.At Manston, not far from Margate, an Auxiliary Units patrol decided to put its hideout in a man-made cave, believed to have been scooped out of the chalk in the seventeenth century by members of a religious order. To make sure that this hideout would not be discovered by the Germans, the Welsh tunnellers who made it went to the trouble of excavating an entirely new branch off one of the old passages. They concealed the room with a huge block of chalk that they mounted on rollers.Brickworks side elevationBrickworks front elevation

The Auxiliary Units hideouts were a major preoccupation of the men, and one by one they solved all the problems of building and maintaining the shelters. Paints were found that would resist condensation, and efficient ventilating systems, often terminating above ground in tree stumps, were devised. When several senior officers from Coleshill went to the Lincolnshire fens to inspect patrols there they were invited to stay for dinner in one of the hideouts. The officers expected a makeshift meal, probably served on packing cases full of stores, but when they slipped down through the trapdoor they were faced with a long dining table covered with a crisp damask cloth. The candles were in candelabra, and the cutlery on the table gleamed.

At the end of the war Royal Engineer demolition teams were sent around the country to destroy all the Auxiliary Units operational bases to keep them from becoming the hideouts of criminals on the run of play places where small children might easily get hurt. However, a number of the hideouts were not destroyed and, although most of them have by now caved in, leaving only rain-washed dents in the ground to mark their positions, a few still survive, mostly on private land where they are unlikely to become a nuisance. Before it is too late ought not at least one of these be turned into a form of national monument or museum? Historically the operational bases of the British Resistance are at least as interesting as the Martello towers that line parts of the coast.

 Quoted from The Last Ditch, David Lampe 1967, reprinted 2007 by Greenhill Books.